Alexa Fluor® 488 Dye
Alexa Fluor® 488 Dye—A Superior Alternative to FITC
You have a choice when it comes to green-fluorescent dyes conjugates. The Alexa Fluor® 488 dye—with nearly identical spectral properties and quantum yield as fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)—produces brighter, more photostable conjugates. These conjugates are ideal for imaging and other applications requiring increased sensitivity and environmentally insensitive fluorescence detection.
See All Products
A Cornucopia of Alexa Fluor® 488 Dye Conjugates
- View all of our Alexa Fluor® 488 Products
Advantages of the Alexa Fluor® 488 Dye Conjugates
Introduced in 1997, the Alexa Fluor® 488 dye is the first dye in 100 years to seriously challenge fluorescein’s dominance as the green-fluorescent dye of choice:
A perfect spectral match for FITC filters—absorption—and emission profiles of Alexa Fluor® 488 and fluorescein are nearly identical, so there’s no need to change equipment, settings, or filters
- Brighter conjugate fluorescence—fluorescein conjugates rapidly quench as more fluorophores are added. Alexa Fluor® 488 dye allows more fluorophores to attached before self-quenching. This produces brighter conjugates (Figure 2) which means you can add less antibody and still get optimal results.
- Superior photostability—allows more time for image observation and capture, permitting greater sensitivity and simplifying low-abundance target detection (Figure 3).
Figure 2—Comparison of the relative fluorescence of goat anti–mouse IgG antibody conjugates prepared from the Alexa Fluor® 488 dye and from fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC). Conjugate fluorescence is determined by measuring the fluorescence quantum yield of the conjugated dye relative to that of a reference dye and multiplying by the dye:protein labeling ratio.
Figure 3—Photobleaching profiles of cells stained with Alexa Fluor® 488 or fluorescein conjugates of goat anti–mouse IgG antibody F(ab')2 fragment were used to detect HEp-2 cells probed with human antinuclear antibodies. Samples were continuously illuminated and images were collected every 5 seconds with a cooled CCD camera. Normalized intensity data demonstrate the difference in photobleaching rates.