Performance Characterization of HisPur Cobalt Superflow Agarose
Purity, dynamic binding capacity, reusability and chemical compatibility properties of a cobalt-charged IMAC resin
by Scott Meier, M.S.; Ramesh Ganapathy, Ph.D.; Aaron McBride, M.S.; Barb Kaboord, Ph.D.; Paul Haney, Ph.D.; Chris Etienne, Ph.D. - 05/02/13
The study of protein function and structure has been greatly enhanced by recombinant protein expression strategies that incorporate fusions of affinity tags to aid in purification. The poly-histidine fusion tag (His tag) is especially popular because it is small (6-12 amino acids) and provides for simple and gentle purification by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC), yielding large quantities of >90% pure protein in one step.
A variety of IMAC supports are commercially available, differing in base support resin, the specific chelator molecule, the method of chelator immobilization, and the metal ion that is chelated (i.e., charged to the chelator). These differences affect the binding capacity, reusability, flow characteristics and chemical compatibility of each IMAC resin, ultimately determining the quality of results (yield, purity, speed) in particular applications. For instance, IMAC resins charged with cobalt typically result in cleaner purifications compared to resins charged with nickel, although nickel usually provides higher binding capacity than cobalt. Also, resins with tetradentate chelators such as nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) result in less metal ion leaching during purifications compared to tridentate chelators such as iminodiacetic acid (IDA). Careful resin selection and method optimization are required for specific applications and scales.
Thermo Scientific HisPur products are IMAC-based supports for his-tagged protein purification. These include magnetic beads and two kinds of agarose resin, cobalt and nickel varieties, and various sizes and formats of bottles and columns. HisPur Cobalt Superflow Agarose uses a proprietary cobalt-charged tetra-dentate chelator immobilized onto highly crosslinked (Superflow) 6% beaded agarose. In this article, we detail the performance characteristics of HisPur Cobalt Superflow Agarose, which is especially suited for small- and large-scale purifications of recombinant poly-histidine tagged proteins by FPLC.
To demonstrate purification efficiency of HisPur Cobalt Superflow Agarose, we overexpressed and then used the resin to purify several recombinant His-tagged fusion proteins by FPLC: green fluorescent protein (GFP), lipoic acid ligase A (LplA), and beta-galactosidase (β-Gal). Purifications resulted in elution fractions with 85 to 98% purity levels, as assessed by SDS-PAGE and densitometry analysis (Figure 1). We also tested and compared purification performance between HisPur Cobalt Superflow Agarose and alternative sources of cobalt- and nickel-based IMAC purification resins (Figure 2). Similar levels of purity were achieved with both cobalt IMAC resins; however, HisPur Cobalt Superflow resin yielded significantly greater purity than similar 6x-His tagged protein purifications on a nickel-NTA IMAC resin from Qiagen.
Dynamic binding capacity
Maximizing the performance of protein purification in FPLC protocols is critical and requires a good understanding of the binding characteristic of a resin under a variety of flow rates. The longer the protein sample is in contact with the resin, the higher the binding capacity will be until it reaches the theoretical maximum capacity for the support (Figure 3). Greater binding capacities are possible with slower flow rates, but these conditions necessarily require increased processing time. Therefore, the profile of a resin’s dynamic binding capacity is an important consideration when optimizing a purification process.
Dynamic binding capacity of a column run at a given specific flow rate (a value that is inversely proportional to residence time) is typically reported as the amount of protein that will bind to the resin before 10% of the target protein accumulates in the flow-through fraction (called the “breakthrough”). Maximizing dynamic binding capacity enables the use of higher flow rates and less resin, while still minimizing target protein loss and controlling process time.
We determined a profile of dynamic binding capacities for HisPur Cobalt Superflow Agarose by applying highly purified N-terminal 6xHis-tagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) to a 1mL resin bed at several flow rates (Figure 3). At a rapid flow rate of 1mL/min (equivalent to a short, 1-minute residence time), the resin exhibited a binding capacity of approximately 20mg 6xHis-GFP per mL of packed resin. At a slow flow-rate of 0.1mL/min (equivalent to a long, 10-minute residence time), the resin had a capacity of 65mg of 6xHis-GFP per mL of packed resin.
Variations in tag accessibility between recombinant proteins, as well as the presence of other proteins and biological molecules in a complex lysate may affect the resin’s overall binding capacity. Therefore, it is important to determine the appropriate balance between flow rate (production run speed) and the capacity (production yield) for each process being developed.
Reusability and compatibility
Depending upon the laboratory setting, affinity purification may be performed at scales ranging from sub-milliliter volumes to many liters. Although it is often easier and cleaner to pack and use a new column each time for small-scale purification, this is not practical or necessary for large-scale processes involving repeated cycles of purification from the same bulk sample. HisPur Cobalt Superflow Agarose is a robust highly crosslinked resin designed for use at a wide range of scales. The resin can withstand linear flow rates as high as 1260cm/hr without compressing. This is almost double the linear flow rate at which Sepharose™ 6B Agarose (GE Healthcare) begins to compress (data not shown).
To demonstrate reusability of HisPur Cobalt Superflow Agarose, we graphed the profiles of repeated cycles of chromatography on a single column (Figure 4). No significant decline in binding capacity or elution efficiency occurred after 5 cycles of purification from a lysate sample and 25 cycles of washing and regeneration. HisPur Cobalt Superflow Agarose can be reused multiple times without stripping the metal or recharging the support between purifications because practically none of the cobalt leaches from the immobilized tetra-dentate chelate column during normal purification and regeneration protocols.
HisPur Cobalt Superflow Agarose has low non-specific binding, and very little residual protein remains on the column after purification. In most cases, a simple regeneration protocol is sufficient: wash with MES-buffered saline, pH 5, to remove bound imidazole, then equilibrate with binding buffer. However, depending upon the clarity, solubility and quality of the sample or cell lysate, precipitated proteins and other hydrophobic substances can accumulate on the resin over time. This leads to an increase in column back-pressure, and decreases protein purity and yield during purification. If this situation does occur, resin performance can be restored with a clean-in-place protocol: wash with 6M guanidine-HCl and 1% nonionic detergent solution. A slight decrease in protein yield occurs after multiple runs when a guanidine/detergent clean-in-place protocol is inserted (data not shown). EDTA stripping and regeneration with cobalt is not necessary for cleaning the resin.
Finally, we evaluated the compatibility of HisPur Cobalt Superflow Agarose with various chemicals commonly used during purification, cleaning, or storage of IMAC supports (Figure 5). We stored the resin as a 50% slurry in the indicated solutions for an extended period of time (2 hours or 1 week). Following incubation, we equilibrated each resin sample in binding buffer and compared its static batch-binding capacity to the untreated resin sample. None of these chemicals significantly affected binding capacity. More stringent clean-in-place protocols using HCl (pH < 2) or NaOH (pH > 12) did dramatically decrease the binding capacity of the resin (data not shown), and should be avoided. Users should also avoid strong chelators such as EDTA and EGTA in lysis, binding, washing and elution buffers because these will strip metal off the resin.
All purification and binding experiments were performed using the following buffer conditions, unless noted otherwise:
- Binding buffer (25mM sodium phosphate pH 7.4, 0.3M sodium chloride, 5mM imidazole)
- Wash buffer (25mM sodium phosphate pH 7.4, 0.3M sodium chloride, 15mM imidazole)
- Elution buffer (25mM sodium phosphate pH 7.4, 0.3M sodium chloride, 0.15M imidazole)
All wash and elution steps were done with 5 to 10 column volumes (i.e., resin-bed volumes). Buffers can also be supplemented with 8M urea or 6M guanidine-HCl for purification under denaturing conditions. The results outlined in this article are considered typical; however, protein yield and purity are influenced strongly by recombinant fusion protein expression level, conformation, solubility and fusion tag accessibility. In some cases, variation of the buffer conditions and flow rates may be required. All recombinant proteins described herein contain a single 6x-His fusion tag and were expressed using E.coli BL21(DE)3 cells grown in LB media and induced for less than 16 hours at 30°C with IPTG. Cells were harvested and lysed with binding buffer containing 0.005% NP-40 and 1x Thermo Scientific Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Part No. 78438) using a microfluidizer.
- Jansen, J-C. (editor). (2011). Protein Purification: Principles, High Resolution Methods, and Applications. 3rd edition. Volume 151 of Methods of Biochemical Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ
- Bornhorst, J.A. and Falke, J.J. (2000). Purification of Proteins Using Polyhistidine Affinity Tags. Methods Enzymol. 326: 245-254.
For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.